Reviews & comparisons with TOMM

Comparison between the WMT & TOMM in 1,315 cases in two countries.

Power Point Show: Lecture given by Dr. Paul Green at the National Academy of Neuropsychology annual meeting in Tampa, Florida on October 18, 2005.

Independent study: "When the Word Memory Test (WMT) was used as the "gold standard" to which the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) was compared, the TOMM achieved very high PPV (.98) and acceptable NPV (.78). How to incorporate the strategy used into clinical practice is discussed".

2005 independent review of Green's WMT by Wynkoop & Denney: PDF

Hartman's WMT Review: PDF

The Nonverbal MSVT contains only pictures. The computerized test takes about 7 minutes of the patient's time and just a few minutes of the tester's time. Data from hundreds of cases from two investigators show that almost all cases failing the TOMM also fail the easy NV-MSVT subtests.  Many cases pass TOMM and fail the NV-MSVT.  It is very important to note that, in cases passing TOMM and failing the NV-MSVT, the profile can only be explained by poor and inconsistent effort.

Thus, there are many false negatives for the TOMM. The NV-MSVT is a more sensitive test of effort than TOMM. Try the NV-MSVT free and see for yourself. This is science, not religion. 

Note on copyright: As the inventor, first author and main researcher of the WMT, MSVT, NV-MSVT & MCI, Dr. Green is the legally registered owner of copyright of the WMT, MSVT, NV-MSVT & MCI internationally. Legitimate copies of the CDs and test manuals and the licenses to use the WMT, MSVT, NV-MSVT or MCI in any format are sold only by Green's Publishing.